Source: Cointelegraph.com NewsRipple is celebrating the United States Securities and Exchange Commission\u2019s (SEC) decision not to pursue a court case against the firm, but it provides little legal certainty for the crypto industry.\u00a0
\nThe US financial regulator has apparently dropped an appeal against Ripple, the issuing firm of crypto asset XRP. The industry saw the case as a prime example of regulatory overreach by the SEC under former chair Gary Gensler.
\nRipple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the decision \u201cprovides a lot of certainty for RIpple\u201d and that while the case is effectively over, there are still some loose ends the firm needs to tie up with the SEC. \u201cWe now are in the driver\u2019s seat to determine how we want to proceed.\u201d
\nStuart Alderoty, Ripple\u2019s chief legal officer, wrote on X, \u201cToday, Ripple moves forward \u2014 stronger than ever. This landmark case set a precedent for the domestic crypto industry.\u201d
\nRipple and the crypto industry as a whole are counting this as a major victory, but the SEC\u2019s decision provides no legal precedent, and the \u201cguardrails\u201d the industry has lobbied for are yet to be defined.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Consequences of Ripple case on lawmaking and precedent Source: Cointelegraph.com NewsRipple is celebrating the United States Securities and Exchange Commission\u2019s (SEC) decision not to pursue a court case against the firm, but it provides little legal certainty for… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125472"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=125472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=125472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=125472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=125472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThe cryptocurrency lobby was quick to celebrate the SEC decision, announced by Garlinghouse at the Digital Asset Summit in New York on March 19. Markets took notice \u2014 XRP price spiked 9% in the first hour following the announcement.
\nSupporters and observers posted on X about the precedent the case would set for the crypto industry. But legal observers are less certain about the overall impact the SEC\u2019s appeal decision will have on the broader crypto industry.
\nLawyer Aaron Brogan told Cointelegraph that the Ripple case \u201ccreates no precedent that any other firm can rely on.\u201d He added there is \u201cno question that the regulatory environment is more favorable to crypto firms today,\u201d but the SEC\u2019s exact policy won\u2019t become clear until Paul Atkins is nominated as chair of the commission.
\nRelated: Crypto regulation must go through Congress for lasting change \u2014 Wiley Nickel
\nBrian Grace, general counsel at the Metaplex Decentralized Autonomous Organization, further noted that the 2023 decision to which the SEC was appealing does not set a legal precedent.
\nHe wrote on March 19, \u201cThe Ripple decision is not binding legal precedent. It was a single district court judge\u2019s ruling based on the facts of that case.\u201d\u00a0
\nThe SEC appeal repeal also has limited influence on the ongoing legislative efforts to create a framework for the cryptocurrency industry in the US. Grace said that the onus is on Congress, not the SEC, to make lasting legal changes for the cryptocurrency industry.\u00a0
\n\u201cThe U.S. crypto industry needs new legislation to provide clarity and protection. Without it, the Plaintiffs bar can continue to sue in district courts across the country relying on Howey. A friendly SEC also does not change this. We need a crypto market structure law,\u201d he said.\u00a0
\nBrogan said that he didn\u2019t think the decision would have any direct effect on the lawmaking process, but the SEC could still solve questions regarding rulemaking.
\n\u201cI think many in Congress would welcome that as the market structure legislation currently percolating appears dead in the water,\u201d he said.
\nGarlinghouse wants to tie up loose ends with SEC
\nThe SEC appeal decision may put the \u201cfinal exclamation point\u201d on whether XRP is a security, but the legal battle between Ripple and the SEC could be set to rage on.
\nIn a March 19 Bloomberg interview, Garlinghouse brought up the possibility of going on the offensive with a cross-appeal, i.e. an appeal from an appellee requesting that a higher court review a lower court\u2019s decision.\u00a0
\nRelated: Bitnomial drops SEC lawsuit ahead of XRP futures launch in the US
\nNamely, Garlinghouse wants to revisit the 2023 decision in which Judge Analisa Torres, while ruling Ripple\u2019s publicly sold tokens did not constitute a security, levied a $125 million fine on Ripple, stating that the tokens should have been sold to institutional investors.\u00a0
\nThe firm is also subject to a five-year \u201cbad actor\u201d prohibition on fundraising which, says Brogan, could meaningfully impact its operations.\u00a0
\n\u201cAt this point, all we\u2019re fighting for is do we want to fight to get the $125 million back,\u201d said Garlinghouse.
\nHe added that while the XRP-securities decision was a \u201cclear legal victory,\u201d there are \u201cpieces of it that we think could be kind of cleaned up. And the question is, do we want to fight that fight? Or can we come to an agreement with the SEC to drop everything?\u201d
\nOutside of the courtroom, Congress is still working to make meaningful progress on the stablecoin bill. Bo Hines, the executive director of the President\u2019s Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, expects the final version to be ready in a couple of months.\u00a0
\nThe crypto framework bill FIT 21 failed to make it through the Senate in the 2024 legislative session, but some lawmakers are optimistic that it will make it through this session with \u201cmodest changes.\u201d
\nThe Blockchain Association, a crypto lobby group, expects both laws to pass by August, while US Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, says they could be finalized by year\u2019s end.\u00a0
\nMagazine: Memecoins are ded \u2014 But Solana \u2018100x better\u2019 despite revenue plungeRead More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"