{"id":21277,"date":"2021-09-18T02:05:27","date_gmt":"2021-09-18T02:05:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/?p=21277"},"modified":"2021-09-18T02:05:27","modified_gmt":"2021-09-18T02:05:27","slug":"super-pac-hits-parnell-on-protective-orders-requested-by-wife","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/?p=21277","title":{"rendered":"Super PAC hits Parnell on protective orders requested by wife"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Politics<\/p>\n<p>A super PAC backing a rival Republican candidate is hitting the airwaves with an ad highlighting two instances when Pennsylvania Senate candidate Sean Parnell\u2019s wife sought protective orders against him.<\/p>\n<p>The ad, from the pro-Jeff Bartos \u201cJobs for Our Future\u201d super PAC, is slated to run on TV on Saturday night during the Penn State University football game against Auburn University. The TV expense and a sizable digital campaign will add up to a six-figure buy, according to the super PAC.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/vimeo.com\/607737839\/efd3521a20\">The 60-second ad<\/a> opens with a montage of Fox Nation clips featuring Parnell making comments about women, including saying, \u201cThe idea that a woman can live a happy and fulfilling life without a man \u2014 I think it&#8217;s all nonsense.\u201d (Parnell has previously dismissed the clip as a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SeanParnellUSA\/status\/1294780455678627841\">comedy appearance<\/a>.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p>Then, the ad references a recent story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, saying court and police records show that Parnell\u2019s wife called 911 and sought protective orders against him in 2017 and 2018. The ad goes on to say that Parnell\u2019s wife was later let go from the charity that Parnell runs, which she sued. The ad concludes by calling this \u201cthe real record of Sean Parnell.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Saturday night&#8217;s football game between 10th-ranked Penn State and No. 22 Auburn is expected to be a major draw in Pennsylvania. Both teams are undefeated, and the game is airing on ABC in prime time.<\/p>\n<p>Bartos and Parnell are two of the best-known Republican candidates in the 2022 race to replace GOP Sen. <a href=\"https:\/\/cd.politicopro.com\/member\/51835\">Pat Toomey<\/a> who is retiring. The super PAC, Jobs for Our Future, had more than $766,000 in its bank account by the end of June, according to its most recent financial disclosure.<\/p>\n<p>Pennsylvania\u2019s primaries are scheduled for next May, and it\u2019s early \u2014 though not unprecedented \u2014 for an outside group to be airing negative ads. But there\u2019s no question where Bartos himself stands on attacking Parnell at this time: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.inquirer.com\/politics\/election\/sean-parnell-protection-from-abuse-orders-jeff-bartos-20210907.html\">Bartos is the one who made the protective orders against Parnell public<\/a>, in an Inquirer interview last week. The revelations are part of a race that is heating up quickly, with former President Donald Trump weighing in recently to endorse Parnell. The pro-Bartos super PAC is also <a href=\"https:\/\/therealseanparnell.com\/\">launching a website to publicize the information about Parnell<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Parnell told the Inquirer that Bartos was being \u201cdesperate\u201d and \u201cdishonorable.\u201d The paper noted that both temporary orders sought by Parnell\u2019s wife were later pulled back, one \u201cunder an agreement between Parnell and his wife,\u201d and the other after a hearing with a judge. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2021\/09\/17\/super-pac-hits-parnell-on-protective-orders-requested-by-wife-512690\">Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Politics A super PAC backing a rival Republican candidate is hitting the airwaves with an ad highlighting two instances when Pennsylvania Senate candidate Sean Parnell\u2019s wife sought protective orders&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":21278,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21277"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21277\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/21278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}