Source: Politics<\/p>\n
The Federal Election Commission has agreed to a fine of over $100,000 against the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton\u2019s 2016 campaign over an investigation into alleged misreporting of spending related to the now-infamous Steele dossier.<\/p>\n
The FEC fined both organizations after a pair of now years-old complaints \u2014 one from the Campaign Legal Center and another from the conservative Coolidge Reagan Foundation \u2014 alleged that the party and campaign reported payments to the powerhouse Democratic law firm Perkins Coie as legal expenses, when in actuality some of the money was earmarked for \u201cpaying Fusion GPS through Perkins Coie to conduct opposition research on Donald Trump,\u201d as the Campaign Legal Center\u2019s original complaint read<\/a>.<\/p>\n The DNC and the Clinton campaign collectively agreed to pay $113,000 in fines, according to separate conciliation agreements the agency made with both parties. The DNC will pay $105,000 and the Clinton campaign $8,000.<\/p>\n The FEC conciliation agreements were made public Wednesday after the Coolidge Reagan Foundation first shared a response letter from the agency with the Washington Examiner<\/a>. POLITICO independently obtained a second, and similar, letter the agency sent to the CLC<\/a>.<\/p>\n The Steele dossier, which was first made public when BuzzFeed News published it in January 2017<\/a>, contained a variety of accurate, inaccurate, unproven and sometimes salacious allegations about ties between Russia and Donald Trump, as well as others in his orbit.<\/p>\n The conciliation agreements found \u201cprobable cause to believe\u201d that both the campaign and national party \u201cmisreport[ed] the purpose of certain disbursements\u201d when they said certain payments to Perkins Coie were for legal fees.<\/p>\n The pair of agreements were signed for the Democratic groups on Feb. 16 by Perkins Coie partner Graham Wilson.<\/p>\n In the agreements, the DNC and Clinton campaign contend that they believed they properly disclosed the spending. The agreements read that the party and campaign do \u201cnot concede, but will not further contest the Commission\u2019s finding,\u201d in order to settle the matters and not incur more legal costs.<\/p>\n Daniel Wessel, a DNC spokesperson, said in a statement that \u201cwe settled aging and silly complaints from the 2016 election about ‘purpose descriptions’ in our FEC report,\u201d while a spokesperson for Clinton\u2019s office did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n The agency\u2019s full factual and legal analysis is not yet publicly available. The FEC has roughly 30 days to make it so, and an agency spokesperson declined to comment beyond noting that time frame for closed complaints. The agency routinely does not comment on specific allegations or enforcement measures.<\/p>\n The civil penalty appears to relate to highly technical rules about how campaign spending through an intermediary should be reported, and not to delve into issues around the legality (or veracity) of the dossier. In a letter addressing one of the complaints, the commission said it dismissed allegations against Marc Elias \u2014 who was then an attorney at Perkins Coie \u2014 and the law firm itself, Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele himself, and other allegations against the DNC over impermissible contributions from foreign nationals.<\/p>\n Trump, in a statement, boasted about the decision and touted a lawsuit<\/a> he brought in federal court in Florida last week against Clinton, allies and others he accused of trying to \u201dtake down and illegally destroy your favorite President, me.\u201d<\/p>\n Josh Gerstein contributed to this report.<\/p>\n