Source: Politics<\/p>\n
They\u2019re weary of the incessant conflicts. The inability to get past the 2020 election results. An endorsement strategy seemingly driven by a bruised and restless ego, rather than the party\u2019s best interests.<\/p>\n
Channeling growing fatigue among rank-and-file Republicans, some of the GOP\u2019s best-known heavyweights are increasingly defying former President Donald Trump in the wake of internecine conflicts from Georgia to Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n
Bold-face Republican names have never been so comfortable crossing Trump as in recent weeks. Former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Mike Pence, and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie were among those lending aid and comfort to one of Trump\u2019s top enemies, Gov. Brian Kemp, in Georgia\u2019s Tuesday primary.<\/p>\n
Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) bucked the former president by stumping this week for Rep. Mo Brooks in his bid for Alabama\u2019s GOP Senate nomination \u2014 the same congressman that Trump unceremoniously ditched after initially endorsing. New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu openly mocked him in front of a Washington dinner audience, joking about Trump\u2019s sanity.<\/p>\n
Few in the party doubt that Trump still maintains an iron grip on his base. They acknowledge the former president\u2019s endorsement in primary contests remains influential. But to many, Trump\u2019s habit of rolling grenades into Republican primaries is getting old, and fears that he might damage the party\u2019s promising prospects for gains this fall appear to be opening a new chapter in the GOP\u2019s relationship with him.<\/p>\n
“We have to be the party of tomorrow, not the party of yesterday,\u201d Christie, who campaigned for Kemp in Georgia, told POLITICO. \u201cBut more important than that, what we have to decide is: do we want to be the party of me or the party of us? What Donald Trump has advocated is for us to be the ‘party of me,’ that everything has to be about him and about his grievances.'”<\/p>\n
Christie added: \u201cTrump picked this fight.\u201d<\/p>\n
Never was it more obvious than in Georgia, where Trump was the proximate cause of the loss of Republican-held Senate seats in 2021 and then ignited a civil war within the party, all because top state officials refused to overturn the 2020 election results there.<\/p>\n
The result was a thrashing at the polls for several Trump-endorsed candidates. Kemp won by a landslide and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, another target of Trump\u2019s ire, also emerged victorious.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think the former president has been poorly advised because he’s made a lot of endorsements in an effort to showcase his formidability,\u201d a Pence adviser said, \u201cand that has the counter-effect that actually shows the endorsement doesn’t carry the same weight it once did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Gregg Keller, a Missouri-based Republican strategist, said it\u2019s essential for an \u201cideologically and culturally diverse\u201d party to have \u201cpolitically countervailing forces\u201d against some of Trump\u2019s ill-advised endorsement picks.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt shows that while people realize Donald Trump is virtually, in every way, still the leader of the Republican Party, people are willing to stick their necks out and support good candidates opposite of Trump when they see them,\u201d Keller said.<\/p>\n
In some of the most contentious Senate primaries this year, top Republicans have found themselves supporting a different candidate than Trump because he waited months to get involved \u2014 after allegiances had already been pledged.<\/p>\n
In Ohio, for example, Trump endorsed J.D. Vance two weeks before the May 3 primary. In Pennsylvania, he threw his support behind Mehmet Oz just over a month before the election.<\/p>\n
In both cases, national Republicans had already offered their support to other candidates months earlier: Cruz, for instance, had endorsed Josh Mandel in Ohio and David McCormick in Pennsylvania. In the months leading up to Trump\u2019s endorsement of Oz, McCormick had assembled a team of former Trump advisers and officials like Kellyanne Conway, Hope Hicks, Mike Pompeo, Larry Kudlow, and Sarah Huckabee Sanders.<\/p>\n
\u201cI can\u2019t imagine that somebody\u2019s been running for office for a year, a whole bunch of people take positions on the race, then Trump decides to endorse somebody, and that means you can\u2019t be for them anymore? Fuck that,\u201d said a national Republican strategist involved in Senate races, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly.<\/p>\n
GOP strategists say this post-primary moment following Trump\u2019s bitter defeat in Georgia isn\u2019t a low-water mark of Trump\u2019s influence, but rather an acknowledgment that he is not the alpha and omega of every political calculation that will unfold from now until 2024.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m not sure he has a clipboard and says, \u2018Well, Tom Cotton didn\u2019t follow my endorsement here and here \u2014 he\u2019s banished,\u2019\u201d the national strategist added. \u201cMike Pompeo didn\u2019t do it here, so he\u2019s against me, and Ted Cruz didn\u2019t do it here.\u2019 You have a decision to make, whether you want to lean in or lean back. In politics, there\u2019s no reward for leaning back \u2014 most are making the decision to lean in and try and win.\u201d<\/p>\n
Now, GOP strategists are turning their attention to Missouri, where the next front in the battle between Republican heavyweights and Trump may unfold.<\/p>\n
With an Aug. 2 primary, Missouri\u2019s safe GOP Senate seat could become more competitive if former Gov. Eric Greitens becomes their nominee, party leaders have warned. Greitens resigned from office mid-term in 2018 amid a criminal case and allegations of sexual assault. Greitens, though, has long remained at or near the front of the pack. Republican and Democratic polling has shown an uncomfortably close general election race if Greitens were on the ballot.<\/p>\n
Trump has yet to endorse in the primary, but some state and national Republicans fear he might weigh in for Greitens.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs President Trump going to endorse Eric Greitens?\u201d Keller asked. \u201cI think that observers believe that that would be a very bad decision for the Republican Party in this situation, and I think it\u2019s important to have people like Sen. Cruz who are willing to come in and say, \u2018I don\u2019t know what the president is going to do, but there are some other good conservatives running in this race.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
Cruz earlier this year endorsed Eric Schmitt, the state\u2019s attorney general who is using the same campaign consulting firm as Cruz, Axiom Strategies.<\/p>\n
Prominent interest groups in the Republican universe also appear to be increasingly comfortable stiff-arming Trump. The Club for Growth, the anti-tax organization headed by David McIntosh, whose super PAC has been one of the top outside spending groups on Senate races this cycle, doubled down on its support for Mandel after Trump endorsed Vance. The Club went so far as to increase its ad buy featuring old clips of Vance disparaging Trump, a decision that reportedly angered the former president and put Trump and McIntosh squarely at odds.<\/p>\n
Weeks later in Pennsylvania, the Club defied the former president once again. Its endorsement of Kathy Barnette the week before the primary election \u2014 including spending more than $2 million on ads supporting her \u2014 could be interpreted as a clear sign of rebuke to Trump\u2019s endorsement of Oz. Barnette\u2019s last-minute momentum likely ate into Oz\u2019s lead, leaving him and McCormick in a tight recount more than a week after the election.<\/p>\n
The Club also stood firm in its Senate endorsement of Brooks in Alabama after Trump rescinded his support in March, continuing to buy television ads on Brooks\u2019 behalf and releasing a statement in which McIntosh called Brooks \u201cthe only principled, pro-growth conservative in the race.\u201d<\/p>\n
After Trump\u2019s decision to yank his endorsement of Brooks \u2014 a move the former president made as Brooks was floundering in the polls, but blamed on the congressman going \u201cwoke\u201d for wanting to move on from the 2020 election \u2014 other prominent Republicans stepped in to lend their support.<\/p>\n
Paul, who, like Cruz, backed Brooks in the Alabama Senate primary, also reiterated his support.<\/p>\n
Earlier this month, the National Rifle Association endorsed Brooks \u2014 support the congressman promptly announced in a television ad that ran across the deep-red state, where Second Amendment rights remain a top priority for voters.<\/p>\n
On Monday, both Cruz and Paul stumped for Brooks, Cruz coming to Huntsville and Paul holding an election eve tele-town hall with 13,000 Republican voters.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you get into the runoff, I\u2019m looking at my calendar \u2014 I think I might want to come down to Alabama and help if you make it into the runoff,\u201d Paul said to Brooks at the end of the call Monday.<\/p>\n
After the Brooks event in Alabama on Monday, Cruz said he was pleased when Trump had initially put his support behind Brooks, but that he was ultimately endorsing the congressman because he believed Brooks was the most conservative candidate in the race \u2014 and one who could win, regardless of Trump\u2019s endorsement.<\/p>\n
\u201cListen, Donald Trump has made a lot of endorsements across the country,\u201d Cruz told reporters. \u201cA lot of them have won, not all of them. And on the vast majority, President Trump and I have agreed and we\u2019ve endorsed the same candidates. Sometimes we haven\u2019t. Everyone\u2019s got to make their own choices.\u201d<\/p>\n
Brooks\u2019 campaign, it turns out, wasn\u2019t finished when Trump pulled the plug. A late surge took him to second place in Tuesday\u2019s primary and he will compete against Katie Britt in a June 21 runoff.<\/p>\n
Christie didn\u2019t tiptoe around some of Trump\u2019s endorsement missteps.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen he\u2019s wrong,\u201d Christie said, \u201che\u2019s wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n