Source: Politics<\/p>\n
It\u2019s been four days since the Supreme Court voted to overturn<\/a> Roe v. Wade \u2014 dismantling a constitutional right that\u2019s been in place for a half-century and granting states the green light to ban abortion \u2014 and a lot has happened.<\/p>\n On Friday, the court\u2019s conservative bloc flexed its muscle in the bombshell 5-4 ruling, underscoring the influence that the three newly confirmed justices, each nominated by President Donald Trump, may have on future decisions. In its opinion, the conservative majority went beyond resolving the case before the court, Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization, overturning the landmark abortion rights cases Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.<\/p>\n Now, it\u2019s up to states to decide whether abortion will remain legal or not. Each week, we’ll chronicle the major developments \u2014 from Congress to the White House, from policy moves in the states to public opinion during the midterms. Here are the first reactions from a post-Roe America:<\/p>\n Abortion was illegal in five states as of Monday, as several states activated so-called trigger laws that immediately banned the procedure following the court\u2019s decision. A judge in a sixth state, Louisiana, temporarily blocked enforcement of his state\u2019s abortion ban<\/a> on Monday.<\/p>\n Clinics in states where abortion is illegal or at risk stopped providing the procedure over the weekend, sending people with appointments scrambling to find other options, according to the New York Times.<\/a><\/p>\n Abortion is expected to soon become illegal in 16 states, and still others may soon see restrictions through court action or pre-Roe bans, according to a POLITICO analysis<\/a>. These bans may come with criminal penalties for abortion providers or patients<\/a>.<\/p>\n Read more:<\/p>\n As access contracts in much of the country, leaders in blue states have sought to position themselves as safe havens<\/a> for people seeking abortion.<\/p>\n Democratic Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, Kate Brown of Oregon and Jay Inslee of Washington pledged a wide range of protections to abortion providers and patients on Friday, including expanding the group of providers who can perform abortions, access to medication abortion and access to telehealth for reproductive health care. They also said they would resist extradition requests from other states with laws against abortions.<\/p>\n Back East, Gov. Charlie Baker of Massachusetts, a Republican, also signed an executive order on Friday protecting abortion patients and providers from potential extradition requests, and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, announced a public information campaign about abortion rights and payment options in her state, where state law protects abortion access.<\/p>\n And in Illinois \u2014 a state already accustomed to providing abortions to patients from nearby states with more restrictions \u2014 Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker announced on Friday that he planned to call a special session of the state Legislature to \u201cfurther enshrine our commitment to reproductive health care rights.\u201d<\/p>\n Read more:<\/p>\n As they currently lack the votes to codify abortion rights nationally, Democratic leaders have rallied around a future-oriented message to supporters since Friday: If you want to fix this, you\u2019ll have to turn out to vote.<\/p>\n The party is expected to raise money around abortion as a top campaign issue <\/a>in the coming months, as many Republicans celebrate<\/a> a major policy win for their base.<\/p>\n \u201cThis cruel ruling is outrageous and heart-wrenching, but make no mistake: It\u2019s all on the ballot in November,\u201d House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Friday.<\/p>\n Additionally, more than 30 Senate Democrats asked President Joe Biden to take \u201cbold action\u201d on abortion access, though they did not outline any particular policies.<\/p>\n In a widely shared Twitter thread, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) urged Democrats to be more specific with their messaging to voters, and to take actions apart from campaigns, including court expansion and opening abortion clinics on federal land.<\/p>\n \u201cBe honest. Details motivate,\u201d Ocasio-Cortez wrote<\/a>.<\/p>\n Soon after the ruling, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) voiced criticism of Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, who claimed the precedent set by Roe v. Wade wouldn\u2019t be overturned during their confirmation hearings. Both senators voted to confirm the Trump-nominated justices.<\/p>\n In an interview with The New York Times<\/a>, Collins said she felt \u201cmisled\u201d by the decision, explaining that she had pressed Kavanaugh on his Roe stance in a private meeting prior to the confirmation hearings. Collins\u2019 staff took diligent notes of the judge\u2019s comments, which included reassurances that he wouldn’t oppose the precedent: \u201cI am a don\u2019t-rock-the-boat kind of judge. I believe in stability and in the Team of Nine.\u201d<\/p>\n As the only Democrat to support Kavanaugh\u2019s confirmation and one of three to back Gorsuch, Manchin also felt duped afterwards, saying that he \u201ctrusted\u201d the two justices when he voted to confirm them. In a statement<\/a>, he said he was \u201cdeeply disappointed\u201d that the two justices testified under oath that Roe was settled legal precedent.<\/p>\n Despite describing himself as pro-life, Manchin stood by the Roe precedent and called for bipartisanship to protect abortion rights:<\/p>\n \u201cLet me be clear, I support legislation that would codify the rights Roe v. Wade previously protected,\u201d he wrote. \u201cI am hopeful Democrats and Republicans will come together to put forward a piece of legislation that would do just that.\u201d<\/p>\n Massive crowds of abortion rights advocates swarmed the streets<\/a> of major cities nationwide following the ruling, expressing frustration and anger as some states prepared to roll back abortion rights immediately. But not everyone turned out to mourn the decision.<\/p>\n In cities including Boston, New York, Chicago, Nashville, Washington and Los Angeles, crowds of people who supported the court’s ruling struck a sharp contrast<\/a> to abortion rights supporters, illustrating the country\u2019s deep divide<\/a> on the ideological issue. Overall, 56 percent of Americans oppose the overturning of Roe v. Wade, while 40 percent support it, according to a NPR\/PBS NewsHour\/Marist poll<\/a> released Monday.<\/p>\n Many protesters voiced concern for the implications the ruling could have on the future. In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas expressed his willingness to reconsider<\/a> precedents set by Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell, which, respectively, established a right to contraception for a married couple, overturned criminal sodomy laws and required states to recognize same-sex marriage. In the majority opinion, however, Alito repeatedly stated that overturning Roe would not threaten other precedents.<\/p>\nPolicy<\/h6>\n
Access immediately restricted in five states; more bans expected<\/h5>\n
Politics<\/h6>\n
Blue state governors pledge resistance and expansion<\/h5>\n
Elections<\/h6>\n
Democrats rally messaging around midterms, ask Biden for action<\/h5>\n
Congress<\/h6>\n
Collins and Manchin \u2018misled\u2019 and \u2018deeply disappointed\u2019 by justices<\/h5>\n
Public opinion<\/h6>\n
Nationwide protests illustrate ideological divide<\/h5>\n