{"id":7371,"date":"2021-04-27T09:33:26","date_gmt":"2021-04-27T09:33:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/?p=7371"},"modified":"2021-04-27T09:33:26","modified_gmt":"2021-04-27T09:33:26","slug":"the-new-hot-job-on-k-street-reconciliation-specialist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/?p=7371","title":{"rendered":"The new hot job on K Street: Reconciliation specialist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Politics<\/p>\n<p>Washington lobbyists are used to trying to puzzle out where House Speaker Nancy Pelosi or Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stand. But as lawmakers start crafting President Joe Biden\u2019s infrastructure package, K Street has been working overtime to decipher the views of a less known but in some ways equally powerful figure: Elizabeth MacDonough.<\/p>\n<p>The increasing likelihood that Democrats will move an infrastructure bill using reconciliation \u2014 which lets the Senate pass legislation with only 50 votes as long it complies with a byzantine set of rules \u2014 has made MacDonough, the Senate parliamentarian, one of the most powerful people in Washington. It\u2019s also changed the influence industry, fueling a sudden demand for lobbyists who specialize in reconciliation.<\/p>\n<p>Lobbyists with reconciliation expertise \u201care at a premium,\u201d said Jim Manley, a former aide to former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid who\u2019s now a consultant. \u201cI know a whole bunch who specialize in it and are busy, and I know a whole bunch who are also getting pinged for advice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I have had many people ask me for my advice\u201d on reconciliation, he added. \u201cUnfortunately, none of them are clients so far. I&#8217;ve got to work a little harder.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As it\u2019s become clearer that reconciliation bills are the chief vehicle for moving anything through Congress, lobbyists have studied up on the finer points of procedure. They\u2019ve sent memos to clients advising them on how to use reconciliation to their advantage. One lobbying firm, ACG Advocacy, held a briefing on reconciliation for the firm\u2019s clients days after Democrats won the Senate runoffs in Georgia \u2014 all but ensuring they would try to pass bills via reconciliation without Republican votes \u2014 that drew about 150 people. At least one lobbying firm has spoken with former parliamentarians to get a better grasp of the process.<\/p>\n<p>Lobbyists have kept an eye on Democratic lawmakers and progressive advocacy groups that have pushed to employ reconciliation as aggressively as possible while Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey\u2019re going to really push the envelope on what\u2019s permissible under reconciliation,\u201d said one Republican lobbyist who\u2019s advised clients on the process.<\/p>\n<p>Lobbyists expect Biden\u2019s forthcoming infrastructure package \u2014 which will likely be passed via reconciliation \u2014 to be much more heavily lobbied than his Covid-19 relief package, which also passed using reconciliation, setting off a potential gold rush for K Street.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEveryone\u2019s working on it,\u201d said Jeff Forbes, a former Democratic Senate staffer who co-founded the lobbying firm Forbes Tate Partners. \u201cIt\u2019s sucking up all the oxygen in D.C.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The demand for reconciliation expertise on K Street is another indication of how the legislative process has broken down in Washington. The Senate has passed only five bills since Biden took office, one of them via reconciliation. While lobbyists are still hired to help shape legislation that moves through Congress the traditional way, much of the action is increasingly narrowed to a few massive bills.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s also true for Democrats and their allies, who have clamored for the Biden administration to try to pass an ever-increasing number of priorities through reconciliation, including immigration reform, which members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2021\/04\/20\/biden-immigration-reconciliation-483822\">pressed Biden on last week<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Labor unions have been working to figure out what aspects of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act they can pass via reconciliation, according to a person familiar with the matter.<\/p>\n<p>And Senate Democrats who were unsuccessful in convincing the parliamentarian to OK a federal minimum wage hike in Biden\u2019s Covid relief bill haven\u2019t ruled out trying again.<\/p>\n<p>While Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) would prefer to raise the minimum wage without resorting to reconciliation, \u201cit\u2019s important to plan for every contingency, so I\u2019m continuing to look at other ways to raise workers\u2019 wages,\u201d he said in a statement to POLITICO.<\/p>\n<p>Reconciliation lobbying is different from trying to shape bills passed through regular order. Lobbyists need to win over not only lawmakers but also the parliamentarian \u2014 priorities that can sometimes be in tension.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGetting the parliamentarian\u2019s approval but losing two Democratic votes leaves you just as far from getting what you want,\u201d said Ryan McConaghy, a former senior adviser to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer who\u2019s now a lobbyist.<\/p>\n<p>Some lobbyists cautioned that Democrats\u2019 narrow margins in the House as well as the Senate were at least as important as a factor in lobbying the infrastructure bill as reconciliation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSomething can fit in reconciliation, and if five Democratic senators don\u2019t like it, it\u2019s not going to happen,\u201d said Al Mottur, a top Democratic lobbyist at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.<\/p>\n<p>The dynamic can work in lobbyists\u2019 favor if they\u2019re trying to keep something out of the infrastructure package rather than get it in. As long as no Republicans end up voting for the package, all lobbyists have to do to neutralize a provision a client views as a threat is to make sure at least one Democratic senator is adamantly against it.<\/p>\n<p>Companies and trade groups seeking definitive answers about whether their priorities can make it into the infrastructure package if it\u2019s passed by reconciliation are likely to be disappointed. While the Byrd rule \u2014 which governs what can go into reconciliation bills \u2014 clearly allows some things and bars others, lobbyists say there\u2019s a lot of gray area.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor many things, it\u2019s impossible to be definitive about whether it would make it in a reconciliation bill or not,\u201d said Sarah Abernathy, a lobbyist at ACG Advocacy who co-hosted a call to brief her firm\u2019s clients on reconciliation.<\/p>\n<p>The process can be so unpredictable that some lobbyists and advocates have argued they might as well push for what they want without worrying about whether their asks will become Byrd droppings \u2014 the crude term for provisions disallowed by the parliamentarian.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cReconciliation is a subjective, capricious process disguised as an objective policy making mechanism,\u201d Aaron Belkin, the director of the judicial advocacy group Take Back the Court, wrote in an email to POLITICO. Belkin co-authored a 16-page memo to Schumer earlier this month arguing that Democrats could add hundreds of new federal judges via reconciliation.<\/p>\n<p>While it\u2019s impossible to predict how the parliamentarian will rule, he went on, \u201cany democracy reforms that cost or that raise money are fair game for budget reconciliation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With reporting by Sam Stein<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2021\/04\/27\/lobbyist-reconciliation-484765\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Politics Washington lobbyists are used to trying to puzzle out where House Speaker Nancy Pelosi or Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stand. But as lawmakers start crafting President Joe&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":7372,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7371"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7371\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/cryptospotters.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}